<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CPhTLink.com &#187; Pharmacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cphtlink.com/tag/pharmacy-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cphtlink.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 05:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Iowa judge ask pharmacy board to look at marijuana</title>
		<link>http://cphtlink.com/2009/04/27/iowa-judge-ask-pharmacy-board-to-look-at-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://cphtlink.com/2009/04/27/iowa-judge-ask-pharmacy-board-to-look-at-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cphtlink.com/?p=1718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(AP, kttc.com Des Moines) &#8211; A Polk County judge says a state pharmacy board must consider whether marijuana has accepted medical uses.
Thursday&#8217;s ruling Judge Joel Novak doesn&#8217;t legalize medical marijuana in Iowa, but it requires the Iowa Board of Pharmacy to consider whether it&#8217;s properly classified as a Schedule I substance.
To be classified as Schedule [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(AP, kttc.com Des Moines) &#8211; A Polk County judge says a state pharmacy board must consider whether marijuana has accepted medical uses.</p>
<p>Thursday&#8217;s ruling Judge Joel Novak doesn&#8217;t legalize medical marijuana in Iowa, but it requires the Iowa Board of Pharmacy to consider whether it&#8217;s properly classified as a Schedule I substance.<span id="more-1718"></span></p>
<p>To be classified as Schedule I, a drug must have a high potential for abuse and no safe medical use within the U.S.</p>
<p>Last summer, a group, including the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa, petitioned the pharmacy board to remove marijuana from the Schedule I classification. The board ruled against the petition last fall and the ACLU appealed.</p>
<p>The judge&#8217;s ruling says the board must review the classification and decide whether marijuana has an accepted medical use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cphtlink.com/2009/04/27/iowa-judge-ask-pharmacy-board-to-look-at-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Pill Might Prevent Heart Disease</title>
		<link>http://cphtlink.com/2009/04/02/one-pill-might-prevent-heart-disease/</link>
		<comments>http://cphtlink.com/2009/04/02/one-pill-might-prevent-heart-disease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cphtlink.com/?p=1436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Health Day) Create a single pill that contains a statin, three blood pressure drugs and aspirin, and you have an inexpensive medication that can reduce the risk of heart attack, stroke and other cardiovascular problems.
Or so researchers hope.
A first trial of the polypill (which already has a brand name, Polycap), has been successful, according to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Health Day) Create a single pill that contains a statin, three blood pressure drugs and aspirin, and you have an inexpensive medication that can reduce the risk of heart attack, stroke and other cardiovascular problems.</p>
<p>Or so researchers hope.<span id="more-1436"></span></p>
<p>A first trial of the polypill (which already has a brand name, Polycap), has been successful, according to a report that was to be presented Monday at the American College of Cardiology annual meeting in Orlando, Fla., and online in The Lancet.<!--more--></p>
<p>The polypill contains generic versions of the blood pressure medications atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide and rampiril, as well as simvastatin (Zocor) and aspirin. It is designed to attack three major risk factors of cardiovascular disease &#8212; high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol and formation of artery-blocking blood clots. It is being tested by an Indian company, Cadila Pharma.</p>
<p>The idea was originated by a group of physicians trained in India and now at McMaster University in Canada, said Dr. Koon Teo, a professor of medicine at McMaster and a member of the research team.</p>
<p>&#8220;We know that there are many medications that are beneficial,&#8221; Teo said. &#8220;But often people don&#8217;t like to take many pills, and doctors don&#8217;t give patients all the pills they might need.&#8221;</p>
<p>The first trial enrolled 2,053 people with one risk factor, such as high blood pressure, but no cardiovascular disease. They were divided into nine groups, one taking the polypill, the others various combinations of the medications.</p>
<p>The study, done at 50 centers in India, was designed to answer several questions:</p>
<p>Would the five-drug polypill deliver the same effect as individual pills? What reduction in blood pressure and cholesterol could it achieve? Would there be harmful interactions between the ingredients? Would aspirin reduce the blood-pressure-lowering effect?</p>
<p>The answers were favorable. The polypill reduced systolic blood pressure (the higher of the 120/80 reading) by 7.4 points and diastolic blood pressure by 5.6 points, better than the reduction produced by individual medications. LDL cholesterol reductions were almost as great as those produced by individual doses of simvastatin, the statin in the polypill. Readings showed a reduction in urinary levels of a clot-associated molecule. There was no indication of harmful interactions for those taking the polypill.</p>
<p>The blood pressure reduction caused by the polypill would lower the risk of heart disease by 24 percent and lower stroke risk by 33 percent, the researchers estimated. The cholesterol-lowering effect would reduce heart disease risk by 27 percent and stroke risk by 8 percent, they estimated.</p>
<p>And putting those benefits into one pill would increase the possibility that healthy people would actually take the medications needed to keep them healthy, they said.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think this is a good idea, in that even though all these drugs are available in separate pills, people don&#8217;t take them for lots of reasons &#8212; logistics, costs, availability,&#8221; said Dr. Christopher P. Cannon, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, who wrote an accompanying commentary in The Lancet. &#8220;If one had a simple, inexpensive pill, it could open cardiovascular protection to many people.&#8221;</p>
<p>Millions of Americans who are at risk of cardiovascular disease because of common conditions, such as obesity and high blood pressure, are potential beneficiaries of a polypill, Cannon said. &#8220;They should be taking cardiovascular medications, but don&#8217;t, because they are otherwise healthy,&#8221; he said. &#8220;If there were one, simple pill, they might be open to taking it.&#8221;</p>
<p>More studies obviously are needed, Cannon said, and physician care would be necessary if the pill became available. &#8220;You can&#8217;t just give it and walk away,&#8221; he said. &#8220;You would have to monitor for side effects, but once you get past that hurdle, one simple pill would help.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some major regulatory changes by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration would be necessary for the polypill to be available in the United States, Cannon added. &#8220;The current mandates of the FDA are that a combination pill would have to be tested for every combination of every drug included in that pill. That obviously would not be feasible in this case. It would require a re-looking at the rules by the FDA, and for that, one needs larger and longer studies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even with those hurdles to overcome, a polypill would be &#8220;a major step forward in trying to simplify and broaden the applicability of all the medications that reduce cardiovascular risk,&#8221; Cannon said.</p>
<p>The next step would be a major trial of the polypill among people with clear risk of cardiovascular disease, Teo said. If such a trial succeeded, the hope is that a drug company would pick up the idea, he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;The concept is important, and we are testing the concept,&#8221; Teo said. &#8220;Once the concept is proved, we hope that a company in Europe or the United States could see that something can be done with it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cphtlink.com/2009/04/02/one-pill-might-prevent-heart-disease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nevada Supreme Court considers pharmacy liability issue</title>
		<link>http://cphtlink.com/2009/03/10/nevada-supreme-court-considers-pharmacy-liability-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://cphtlink.com/2009/03/10/nevada-supreme-court-considers-pharmacy-liability-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal-mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drugtopics.modernmedicine.com://724dff19ee80dc715a8515cf8698fa88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a case involving Wal-Mart and other drug retailers, the Nevada Supreme Court will decide whether pharmacies are legally responsible for death and injuries to non-customer third parties.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[(drug topics)In a case involving Wal-Mart and other drug retailers, the Nevada Supreme Court will decide whether pharmacies can be held legally responsible for death and injuries to non-customer third parties.

A lower court dismissed pharmacists, Wal-Mart, and various other large drug retailers from a case involving a woman who caused a death while under the influence of prescription drugs. The decision was appealed. <span id="more-1194"></span>

Patricia Copening was under the influence of hydrocodone on June 4, 2004, when she slammed her Dodge Durango into Gregory Sanchez Jr. and Robert Martinez, who had pulled over to the side of the road to fix a flat tire. Sanchez died and Martinez was severely injured. Copening served nine months in the Clark County Detention Center for the crime. Now, the families of the two men have sued Copening, the two doctors who prescribed her medication, and seven pharmacies that dispensed the medication.

The pharmacies are liable, the victims’ attorney argued, because they continued to fill prescriptions even after being notified of Copening’s drug abuse. Nevada was among the first states to seek to reduce drug abuse by tracking every prescription filled in the state. Nevada tracks the date the prescription is filled, the medication type and quantity, and the names of the patient, prescribing doctor, and pharmacy.

About a year before the accident, in June 2003, the Prescription Controlled Substance Abuse Prevention Task Force warned the doctors and pharmacies that had supplied Copening that she might be a drug abuser. Its letter to the pharmacists did not tell them what to do, but urged them to “use their professional expertise to assist patients who may be abusing controlled substances.” Phil Aurbach, attorney for the victims’ families, argued that Wal-Mart and the six other pharmacies “ignored the letter.” He also said that some pharmacies threw the notice away and that none made a note of Ms. Copening’s abuse in pharmacy drug records. The pharmacies just continued to fill her prescriptions, he said.

District Court Judge Douglas Herndon dismissed the pharmacies from the lawsuit, saying that Nevada’s law is unclear about what action pharmacies should have taken after being notified about a suspected drug abuser.

He addressed the difference between a legal duty, which he said is not present under Nevada law, and an ethical responsibility to protect the public. Herndon said he hoped pharmacies would see the potential for abuse and say, “Hey, we’re not filling this anymore.” But that does not translate to a legal duty to cut off Copening’s access to medication, he said.

The attorneys for the defendants argued that since Nevada bartenders are not liable for customers who drive drunk, the same rule should be true for pharmacists who provide pills to suspected drug addicts.

Aurbach argued that the same rules should not apply to both professions. Aurbach said the case is believed to be the first of its kind in the nation, claiming that pharmacies have a duty to take action where there is “drug-seeking behavior.”

If the State’s Supreme Court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it will mean that any pharmacist aware that a customer is a prescription drug abuser must call the doctor or stand on the legal right to refuse to fill the prescription.

No matter the outcome, the case will proceed against Copening and Drs. Richard Groom and Doyle Steele, whose licenses have been revoked by the Nevada State Medical Examiners Board.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cphtlink.com/2009/03/10/nevada-supreme-court-considers-pharmacy-liability-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

